Friday, 18 June 2010

Who the hell do you think you are?

My elderly parents particularly on my father’s side have spent a substantial part of his life ‘clearing out’ his paternal loft and last Sunday handed me a cardboard box that had once held a gross of ‘Privet’s Sternest Surgical Supports’. He thought I might find the contents interesting. Interesting tends to mean ‘take this home and dispose of it in your loft‘, for at least twenty years this generational passing the baton piecemeal has been going on regularly and relentlessly.

On Tuesday, I had a rummage through before depositing it in the attic and thus continuing the forgotten familial collective memory with an instinctual genetic imperative. My father’s latest assault on his roof-void proved to be a partial victory of sorts, the box contained several dog-eared photographs of old pets long gone, some volumes from the innocently named ‘How To’ series of books and a bundle or rack of magazines. These periodicals, dating from September 1935 to July 1939 seemed to be of only passing interest initially; perhaps a smile and puzzle at bygone quirks and a puzzle and frown at the prevailing climate of attitude in those halcyon inter-war dancing years. However, I found pressed and neatly nestling between some of the pages were a few drawings by my great-grandmother Effie Stimp, and on closer inspection her name also appeared in print. At last a possibly mildly famous antecedent, I felt like soon Dame surely, if not already, Joanna, for goodness‘ sake Lumley.

Long before I was born, Effie had tragically passed away when the side-car of my great-grandfather’s Triumph motorcycle had become sadly and suspiciously detached and she had overtaken two Morris Minors and a horse before coming to grief at the stanchion of a bridge on the A10. Having never known her I have only ever had a vague impression of who she really was, my elderly parents being reticent to the point of huffy on the subject. However, here in this box was at last something tangible that can’t just be simply not-talked about, no more of the shushing and waving dismissals or conveniently interrupted interrogation with faked asthma attacks or an irresistible Midsomer Murders esuriency. At the next opportunity, I may well pose some uncomfortably penetrative questions. It seems Effie Stimp regularly drew cartoons for various magazines and I have scanned in one that appeared in the March 1936 edition of Good Housekeeping.



When I get time, I’ll scan some more, and if possible find out why this wife, woman and possible victim of great-grannycide became so un-talked about even in a preternaturally taciturn family.

Terry, if indeed Terry it is or ever was, has been delayed and his arrival and imminence of or not has lost the interest of the office-guys, who are now optimistically juggling World Cup fantasies, fears and covoluted permutations of possible outcomes, all of which conclude with England winning the whole thing. A rare chance, and one to be grabbed for the quadrennial Zeitgeist of flag waving around the world.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The cartoon is the best thing in an otherwise endless diatribe of you, you, you. A blog should be topical and up to date, not some ridiculous confusion of recollected memories that is of no interest to anyone. Get real. You should go to twitter where you have to be relevant and get something from there. That Dan is right it looks a waste of bandwidth more than anything. And stop the psychology rubbish. Just some advice - I read a lot of blogs and can see where they all go wrong.
Most of them are a lot better than yours obviously.

Nactus Stimp said...

Thanks for that advice, very kind of you to take the trouble to point out where it’s all going wrong, but to be honest that is Dan’s job and he does it very thoroughly, and sorry but he was here first. I hope you’re not one of those people that consider history irrelevant, it’s extremely pertinent to the present and to the future, even at the mundane level of family history. If we dismissively think of our predecessors as discreet units and ignore any genetic or memetic influences then we are ignoring a wealth of potential self-awareness and a compelling causality, a thought which I’m guessing you don’t want to be expanded upon.

Think downward Anon, as they say, bad as this blog is try to think how it could be even worse and there, right there is your bright spot of counterfactual comfort.

Anonymous said...

That is exactly the sort of cr@p I'm talking about and th latest post is probably worse than the rest

Nactus Stimp said...

Anonymous, can you realistically expect individuation, in the more general socio-web sense as opposed to the Jungian develop-mental (haha) sense, from an uncaring and wholly irrational blog? Have you ever thought that Nietzsche’s ‘will to power’, simplified, his conceptual overriding motivation and driving force for all human behaviour and actually everything else besides, can manifest itself very comfortably and unpalatably on the internet in it’s anonymity? Are we seeing here some skewed and artificially construed and internalised social hierarchy, through inversely a surfeit of resources, that nullifies an inferiority/dominance conflict? Or is it simply a compulsive wall spraying where the wall in this instance is a comments area, and driven by a sub-conscious and unfulfilled creative, but ultimately destructive, narcissism that through it‘s cognition can only reinforce the feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, frustration and subordination? And was this response to your comments in every way sufficiently annoying?